Parents, remember? Exercise your soul today


[4 minute read]

Remember when you held your babies, and simply adored them, pouring out your love, as if the loving could be touched tangibly? Why did we do that? Was it because some social conditioning would make us feel inferior if we didn’t? No way. In most of those countless moments, there were no social witnesses. They were private moments between us and our babies. Only you and your baby were the witnesses.

What did you see? Pure, innocent vulnerability. A raw need to which no shame could be attached. An infant’s raw, natural need. That infant did not create the need, nor did you. It was purely natural.

And what did your baby experience? Much of what *you* were experiencing. Raw, innocent, purely natural, shameless vulnerability, being met by loving in a pure form, not motivated by any sense of social obligation, duty, or judgment. Natural loving.

That baby knew nothing about the world or shame or judgment. That infant had no concept of imitating love for the sake of appearing loving or nice or correct. That baby knew virtually nothing, and, at the same time, new almost everything that mattered. Human relationship in its purest and most natural form. Pure and natural loving.

Somewhere along the way, that natural loving got mixed in with imitative love as others watched us parent. We wanted to be doing things “right.” Diapering, bathing, dressing, feeding. We didn’t want to be seen by others as doing it incorrectly. Judgment crept into our loving.

There’s not a thing about parenting that is easy. Except the loving in those private moments. That is all. That was the purest of our nature. We acted from within, from our own fullness and completeness, with no need for guidance to be properly loving in those moments. There was no question of believing in ourselves, and our nature, and our capacity for loving.

Insecure, we tuned our ears to external guidance. “You shouldn’t pick up your baby every time it cries or they will become too dependent and not learn self comforting.” Your baby shouldn’t sleep with you. You should impose a feeding schedule. Etc. Think of all the opinionated debates you had with other parents or guides, even if only in your own head.

Our insecurity with the rawness and natural power of pure loving made us question whether we were doing everything right. That power is mysteriously overwhelming, after all. We excused our self-doubt and self-judgment as wanting the best for our babies. As if the best for them were not our true nature of pure loving. We questioned whether acting from within, purely from our heart, was right, or best. That self-questioning seemed very natural; by the time we are parents, we have had countless experiences of being wrong and doing things incorrectly. Why would we not have the same feelings about parenting?

During our own childhood and adult lives, we learned to defend our egos and appear as good people. Those conditioned scripts were tragically bound to overtake the purely natural loving of parenting. But moments of that natural loving arise occasionally, as our children grow up, and we are moved from within by that same natural loving. And so we rely on those moments — they are, after all, the most powerful experiences — to feed our self defenses…

We think to ourselves, “I am a good parent because I still love my child so naturally and deeply for who they are, not what they do, and not as others judge them.” That is true, but it is mixed in with false and imitative love, just as we have spent our lives defending against our flaws to protect our selves. We find ourselves competing against other parents, and, sadly, almost universally, against our child’s other parent.

As we defend ourselves from others, and even from our own self failings, we drift farther and farther from our deepest nature: Loving from the inside, not for the sake of battling judgment. Loving from the mysterious depth of our very nature.

But that nature has not disappeared. That nature remains underneath all of the external masks…

Today, lock eyes with another person, stranger or known. Even if for a moment, listen to them, feel with them, and don’t think. Suspend yourself in a judgment-free vacuum, and that purely natural loving will flow from that neglected or forgotten source deep within you. When you’re conscious that that happens, you can do it more often. It is our nature.
.
Neil D. 2020-06-01


I am being loved (2). You. Your Power. A Christface


[1.5 minute read]

My love letter to you (IV)—the many who have touched me so deeply lately…

“If I turned to face my Lover, I most often wouldn’t sense a face, but outstretched arms, meekly calling. Inviting. Longing.”

[— I am being loved (1)]

Sometimes when I am being loved by God, there IS a face.
It is yours.

Sometimes, there are mortal arms enfolding me.
And they are yours.

Sometimes our eyes lock.
Sometimes they mist up.
Sometimes it is a still gaze that can’t be described.

Sometimes you lower your eyes. Sometimes, out of compassion for my vulnerability, you avert your eyes.

Sometimes you gaze into distance searching, for a moment, to feel my feelings, to summon empathy.

Sometimes you avert your gaze to pause in thought and await understanding. To know me more deeply. I am being loved by God. Yours is God’s face to me in the moment.

Sometimes you avert your eyes because — rarely, I hope –- I discomfit or sting you, reminding me that you too are exposing your frailty in trust, via soul-soul relating. It is important to me that you show hurt when I hurt you—a reminder to me that you are not God, but that we are being loved. Being loved by one another. In sacred intimacy, infinitely vulnerable.

Your signal that I have hurt you is a reminder of my power. My power for being loved, and my power for loving. Intimately exchanged power. You are equally powerful. Equally, and differently. Thankfully. I am being loved. You are being loved.

When you give me a hug, a call, or send me a message, I am being loved.

And when no one else is near me, and no one else is communicating with me, I am being loved. By the One who knows all of my weaknesses, failings, and the pain I have caused. Still, I am being loved. Still.
.
[More love letters]
.
Neil D. ~2019-11-13


I am being loved


(~3 minute read)

I am being loved.

I like that wording more than, “I am loved,” or, “I am loved by God.”

And, “God loves me,” feels like God — as a third-person subject — is an idealization, or objectification, external to me, out there, elsewhere; and I’m just a passive object. Doesn’t feel right.

“I am being loved,” feels more intimate, warm, breathing with aliveness. “Am being.” More present. Has more action. Evokes a sense of arms actively enfolding me, or my head being drawn to rest in a bosom. Passionate, at this moment, in the present.

When joy or gratitude swell up from my heart as a lump in my throat, I am being loved by God.

When I feel uncertain, or am running late, frustrated, I am being loved.

When I feel judged and rejected, I am being loved.

When I want to weep, or am sobbing, I am being loved.

When my ruminations can’t transcend my human frailty, and self-talk overloads my thoughts, or I feel ashamed, abandoned, depressed, or I feel resentment, or regret, I am being loved by God.

It reeks of tender relentlessness. The pursuit never stops, yet never is there chasing. No guilt, no haunting. I am being loved.

My Pursuer is not — when I stop to turn — standing too closely or threatening or exerting a reminder.
The face is not a scowl of disapproval.

Brows are not raised, expecting or awaiting self-indictment.

Eyes are not downcast to spare my shame.

I am being loved by God.

If I turned to face my Lover, I most often wouldn’t sense a face, but subtly outstretched arms, below horizontal, not reaching for me. Meekly calling. Inviting.

Longing.

Palms outward, fingers relaxed, not grasping. But there is no question that those hands will catch me. Not wrestle to hold me up and keep me from falling. Just a perfectly gentle, weightless catch naturally matched to my collapse. A melting into.

My only impulse is to curl up into that bosom, surrendered to a non-conquerer.

If I am feeling gratitude or joy, it is a shared happiness for me.

When I am weak for any reason, it’s an embrace of comforting, warm stillness. No words. Just compassionate presence.

I am being loved.

Not, “I will be loved by God,” with some “if…” attached.

AM BEING.

Not, “if” I just believe, if I surrender, if I work at this, if I stop that, if I meditate more, if I pray and ask… Already am being loved. Then and now. But ‘then’ no longer matters, or matters less until it matters not at all as I rest in that bosom, being loved.

I am being loved.

.

-Neil D. 2019-11-13


Sequel: I am being loved (2). You. Your Power. A Christface


Anger. Addiction warning

[1.5 minute read]

“What is your anger enabling, protecting against, or symptomatic of?”

Anger protects, bodily and emotionally. From what? It so immediately follows a preceding feeling that we don’t usually recognize its precursor: Anxiety/fear. Of bodily or emotional injury.

Two hormones involved in anger are like amphetamines and painkillers. Instant energy to alertly respond to the threat, and fear suppression (numbing) to function better under its overwhelm. Reread that as you think about being cut off while driving. It all happens in a flash. Thinking takes too long, so we could die literally.

Anger defends threats to ego in intimate relationships. If a loved one touches a raw nerve, we get angry to defend that weakness—that sense of Self that we aren’t perfect or enough. Energized, and numbed to the fear and its shame, we lash out defensively. We do regretful things under the irresistibly powerful influence of amphetamine and painkiller.

Cocaine is an amphetamine. Opioids are pain killers. It is no metaphor or analogy to say that anger acts by involuntarily addictive circuits that are evolutionarily deep necessities to survival. There is no controversy: Anger is addictive.

If you’re angry at God, how is fear involved? Leave a comment…


Read more in this Psychology Today article.
Highlights

[2.5 minute read]

“Anger is not a primary emotion. It arises from some other feeling which it contrived to camouflage or control.

“The internal dynamic is the same for a host of emotions that, as soon as they begin to surface, can be effectively masked, squelched, or preempted through secondary anger.

“Anger is a double-edged sword: terribly detrimental to relationships but crucial in enabling vulnerable people to emotionally survive in them.

“…anger covers up the pain of our ‘core hurts,’ like feeling ignored, unimportant, accused, guilty, untrustworthy, devalued, rejected, powerless, unlovable, shameful.

“Anger helps us soothe ourselves by potently invalidating whoever or whatever led us to feel invalidated.

“We self-righteously proclaim our superiority. After all, we’re not wrong, or bad, or selfish; it’s our spouse, child, neighbor, coworker.

“Transforming helpless feelings into anger instantly provides us with a heightened sense of control.

“If anger can make us feel powerful, able to address our deepest doubts about ourselves, no wonder it can end up controlling us. It’s every bit as much a drug as alcohol or cocaine.

“Contrary to feeling weak or out of control, anger fosters a sense of invulnerability—even invincibility (particularly in the realm of relationships).

“…anger ensures safety in close relationships by regulating distance.

“…we are wary of openly expressing such needs and desires to a partner who might invalidate them and reopen wounds:
Distancing through protective anger feels essential.

“Anger pushes a partner away, and *also* gets them to withdraw.

“Feeling disconnection from a partner revivifies old attachment wounds and fears, so at times the dance changes and the distancer becomes the pursuer.

“Anger can be unconsciously employed in a variety of ways to regulate vulnerability in committed relationships.

“Anger can also, ironically, be a tactic for engaging the other—but at a safe distance.

“To corrupt Descartes, the assumption here might be: ‘We fight, therefore we exist [as a couple].’

“…anger as a tip-of-the-iceberg emotion can conceal so very much below it:

What is your anger enabling, protecting against, or symptomatic of?

[At the end of the linked article are links to excellent. additional related articles.]

Love Is Not a Noun (4). Fear of rejection is belief-based. Only.


[3 minute read]

Do you believe in love, or imitation?

Albeit an oversimplification, don’t you think the understood Self and the expressed Self is a balance between fears? The balance between fear of rejection and fear of fiercely loving our Selves?

What can hurt more than having rejected a uniquely original creation out of nothingness, by a sheerly willful act of the heart (loving)?

Sometimes it is our imitation of loving that is rejected. That’s probably good. No one likes dishonesty. But when it’s authentically our own creation, it’s as if our whole being is rejected. What’s perhaps most deeply tragic about that is our own belief:

How can we believe that something we create out of the depths of our own individual being is even *subject* to acceptance or rejection?

How does that belief and dread creep into your thinking? By your largely repressed shame telling you that imitating loving acts for the sake of acceptance is dishonest?

When your loving is authentic, and not imitation, it is not open to judgment. It’s infinitely outside realms of comparison because it’s utterly unique. Unique things are incomparable. This is why judging any person in their fullness is so perditiously horrific.

That which — in any person, or by any person — is authentic, is original and unique in all creation. Your acts of authentic love are sacred. The image and likeness of the divine. Their acceptance or rejection by any other person is irrelevantly impossible.

Your authentic acts of love are uniquely original, so stand as undeniable acts of creating, flowing from a divine source, which is YOU. Don’t believe their value stands on acceptance or rejection. Their value stands on their source—which is YOU. And that is why not a one of us doesn’t have authenticity at the top of our value hierarchy. Authentic acts of love stand on their own. Authentic IS divine.

When you act sheerly out of love, you are expressing the fullest of you. The deepest beauty in this is that there is no shame in loving what you create. In loving your loving. That’s not egotistical at all. You do not love authentically for the sake of the ego; you do so for the sake of your full Self. It’s an expression of your nature. Which is your soul. Entirely natural. No shame. Loving comes from and feeds souls, not egos—except accidentally, consequentially. Authentic love is shame’s utter opposite. God isn’t shamed by loving God’s creations.

Let your ego feel wonderful about your authentic loving. Your soul already does, before you even know it. And all of creation depends on your part in creating. Divine. Sacred.
Love that.
Love you.

So, love.
Create.
Bring into being.

That which is authentically created canNOT be uncreated (by rejection).

Don’t imitate love for the sake of acceptance or positive judgment.

Love fiercely for its own sake. Yours.

To hell with judgment and rejection!

Leave a comment below, wording your own resolve to love your lovingness today, at least a few times.
.

Neil D. 2020-05-21

Related:
Love Is Not a Noun (2). What IS Love? (“Acts of love are so profound because they are utterly original. They arise from a purely unique creator. YOU are unique. YOU are a creator.”)